The Level of Disaster Preparedness of Pangasinan State University

THE LEVEL OF DISASTER readiness OF PANGASINAN STATE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS, LINGAYEN CAMPUS S. Y. 2012-2013 A seek musical composition Presented to Dr. Lorna G. Urbiztondo In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Course ProfEd 117 ( excogitation to Research) By Ryan S. Oris March 2013 quotation I would to express my sincerest appreciation and gratitude to the concourse behind the success of this labor movement * To Dr. Lorna G. Urbiztondo, Research Adviser for her very supportive and professional guidance and stinting aid * To the Staff of PSU Library, for allowing me to borrow undergraduate thesis * To Mrs.Helen Braga Mabanta, registrar of PSU Lingayen Campus for giving me the tally population of enrolled pupils in this university * Most of all I would like thank my families, fri deceases and classmates for their inspiration and imageing * And finally the Eternal and Gracious God, for answering and providing the infallible intellect, strength, spiritual guidance in the completion of this content. Phenomenal things happened because of this people. I worry that all blessings and love be faceered upon them. Chapter 1 The line and Its BackgroundI. Introduction Prepargondness in time of misfortunes noticen to be critical for households, communities and businesses entirely m all people re mains un b venture. Mindanaos ar blown in the wind, terminations in flashfloods. A shocking news that Typhoon Pablo pounds Mindanao last December 2012. It was approximated that this typhoon killed just somewhat 2,000 people and wiped out their run lowlihood and in like manner residential argonas. More than 90 percent of infrastructures are destroyed in Compostela Valley, Davao Oriental and parts of the Agusan provinces (Inquirer News).This calamity serves to emphasize the signifi raftce of the responsibility of individual, topical anesthetic coordination and effective plans to ensure the readiness to serve and cope from major(ip) unexpected eve nts. Natural or synthetic mishap may flow in many forms, anytime, anywhere without evoke notice. If we caught un wide-awake, it causes damage and devastation it brings to lives and properties. adventure may strike in any place whether at home, in school, in church, in market, in the workplace or in the streets.Further to a corkinger extent, learners are ane of affected in sequel of these contingencys- one reason why government promotes enhancing skills and association as a major creature to cope with any eventuality that might come in life. As governments prime duty is to forbid and untroubledguard people from incoming chance and other forms of catastrophe (CWTS Coursebook, 2009). In school or community, at that place are volunteer groups read armed service and programs promoting the effective and appropriate measures in regularise to abate dangers.This enquiry assesses the end result of training services and programs to students. The pur order of this inquiry is to examine the accredited happening provision take aim of campus students at Pangasinan nominate University, Lingayen Campus in order to explore strength and weaknesses to be utilize in future campus cataclysm zeal plans. If the University already aware with this knowledge, the university ordain be able to more(prenominal) effective plan, develop, and implement procedures in order to move in an good manner to preserve life and property in the event of a disaster on campus.This descriptive research used a numeric survey to assess the following research questions What is the pen of the PSU- Lingayen Campus students in footing of age, sex and elegant spatial relation? What is the level of cookery in undercoat of inwrought and man-made disasters? What are the enigmas en paying backed by the respondents in the readying of disasters in foothold cancel and man-made disasters? This research used questionnaires to explore the lieu of their facility for a disaster . Significance of the Study The out come in of this research is deemed strong to the following * The Students.They go away able to know the level of disaster provision of Pangasinan claim University students. They leave be more active in training services and programs concerning to disaster readying. * The Teachers. This regard will give a feedback to the teachers on teaching disaster facility especially to NSTP (National Service Training programme) teachers. * The University Administration. This test will make the university aware on the level of disaster on the watchness of the students and will religious service them coin appropriate programs to cope with the necessity of the students. The hereafter Researchers. Result of this study would be beneficial as a basis for further studies link up to this research and to be inspired to manoeuver more extensive and substantial study about level of disaster preparedness in bigger area. Scope and Delimitation This study prim arily centre on the level of disaster preparedness of students. con multifariousness to the registrar sanction of Pangasinan State University Lingayen Campus, there are 6,447 students who are enrolled in this university. From the hit population, there are 1,793 freshmen, 1,642 sophomores, 1,584 juniors and 1,428 seniors.It except when covers the 10% of the total population. It was conducted during the second semester of S. Y. 20012-2013. Statement of the Problem This study aimed to determine the level of disaster preparedness of Pangasinan State University students, Lingayen Campus S. Y. 2012-2013. Specifically, it sought-after(a) to answer the following sub-problems 1. What is the visibility of the PSU- Lingayen Campus students in terms of the following variables a. brace b. Age c. Section d. Civil Status? 2. What is the level of preparedness in terms of a. Natural disasters . Man-made disasters? 3. What are the problems encountered by the respondents in the preparedness of disasters? Definition of Terms The study used some terms which the researchers outlined for clearer understanding. The following terms are delimitate operationally 1) Disaster. It refers to a inherent or man-made hazard resulting disturbances and disruption of social and economic aspects, outrage of life, and drastic change of environment may happen. It has great effects to Pangasinan State University students, Lingayen Campus. 2) Disaster preparedness.It refers to PSU-LC students ability to respond and recover in the event of a disaster. It encompasses measures aimed at intensifying life safety when an touch occur. 3) take of disaster preparedness. It refers to the level of readiness or education for disaster of the PSU-LC students. 4) Natural disasters. These are disasters that brought by nature. 5) Man- made disaster. These are synthetic disasters that brought by man. Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature and Studies This chapter presents the colligate literature freshe n and studies which served as springboard in the conceptualization of this study.They are reviewed hereunder to show that these studies are consistent with the present concerns of this research. RELATED LITERATURE A. Foreign Disaster may strike anytime, anywhere resulting to great loss and misfortune. Disasters agree 2 kinds, the pictorial and man-made disasters. Natural and man-made disasters, such as earthquakes, floods, skim over crashes, high-rise building collapses, or major nuclear facility malfunctions, pose an ever-present danger challenge to public sine qua non services. According to The CDC (2007) the principal cause of death in the typical college age population is the unintentional injuries.Annually, more than 30,000 deaths occur from unintentional injuries for those between the ages 15 and 35 (CDC, 2007). According to the reports, homicide and suicide are the next two about(prenominal) frequent causes of deaths in age group. From the reports of the U. S Census Bureau (2008), in 2006 with 17. 1 one million million million undergraduate and 3. 4 million graduate students there are more than 20 million college students in the joined States. This defends an increase in students by 3 million, or 17 percent, from the 2000 census teaching.As stated by Aker (2007), colleges represent a epochal target hazard for the communities that they serve with potential for swag amounts of loss of life, economic resources, and future potential if an incident on campus was to occur. Gaull (1997) stated that the barroom of a dangerous occurrence is known as the or so practical way to fulfill life from an unintentional injury. In liberation prevention practices since the days of Benjamin Franklin, the American flak service has participated. From one of his newspaper articles, Mr.Franklin quotes an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of remedy, actually was referring to the everyday hazard of carrying smoldering embers or coals through the home. The exsert of the America Burning Report in 1973, from the National Commission on prove Prevention and Control, was the formal declaration to the seriousness of the net problem in America (EACRR, 2009). NFPA (2011) reports that from 1977 to 2006 that the fire rate in America dropped from 3. 2 million fires to approximately 1. 6 million. Though that represents almost a 50% drop in fires, the firesafety. ov (2011) reports an increase in the number of campus related fire deaths. Since January 2000, 135 college students engender been report to be killed in fires (firesafty. gov, 2011). The H1N1 flu epizootic serves as a great example of new and emerging danger that can quickly comport a significant impact on a college. From august to the end of September 2009, campuses had reported 13,434 crusades of H1N1 and two student deaths (Park, 2009). Colleges across the country were forced to scramble to develop plans and implement counter measures to ensure the safety of their students an d workers. nigh colleges such as Arizona State went so far as to stock up on medications such as Tamiflu to dispense to students, other schools prepared dorms to be used as quarantine locations for infected students (McGraw, 2009). Almost all colleges developed and implemented some sort of prevention upbringing program to deal with the spread of the flu. Ultimately, the education and preventative measures proved to be the most successful measures (CDC, 2010) Campus safety is not provided important to the lives of those on college campuses simply to the reputation of the college which is level(p) to its enrolment and in turn its economic success (Clunn, 2010).It is recommended that individuals be prepared to take mete out of themselves for the frontmost hours of an pinch or disaster (Bayless, 2011 FEMA, 2011). An interesting argument is how prepared college students are in the area of safety prevention. College Watch contended that a major reason for an increase in campus rela ted fires is that the students knowledge level in regards to safety aspects is not proficient. For example, the number one factor prime in campus fires was cooking accidents (Campus conjure Watch, 2011).Cooking safety is a pretty common fire prevention topic in grade school so it is affect that it would be the number one cause of fires on campus. According to Aschenbrener (2001), college campus students, faculty, and module are at riskiness from thousands of contrasting hazards. Prevention practices can teach the normal person how to live safer and how better be prepared for an emergency or disaster that may affect them and their family (Comeau, 2007). For college inhabitants to minimize their risk to death or injury from an unintentional injury they must possess the knowledge and practice prevention strategies.Preparedness is significant. According to White House (2003), preparedness is the humanity of plans, procedures, policies, training, and equipment necessary at the fe deral, state, and local level to maximize the ability to prevent, respond to, and recover from major events. Meanwhile, National Incident Management System (2012) defined preparedness as a continuous roulette wheel of planning, organizing, training, equipping, exercising, evaluating, and taking fixed action in an effort to ensure effective coordination during incident response.This cycle is one element of a broader National Preparedness System in order abating dangers. B. Local The Philippines being a locus of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis and typhoons is a hotbed of disasters. Natural hazards have in? icted thousands ofdeaths and costly damage to property, not provided natural disasters that has great impact to the lives of Philippine but besides the human- bring on or man-made disaster (Corresponding Author). In a report from Citizens Disaster Response Center (CDRC, 2011), a total of 431 natural and human-induced disasters were reported in the Philippines in 201 1.These killed 1,774 people, and affected more than 3 million families or 15. 3 million people, and caused over Php 26 billion in economic damages. Based on the EM-DAT The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database, of the 302 natural disasters that happened worldwide, 33 occurred in the Philippines and 21 in China. Last category, the country was scarcely tertiary on that list with only 14 natural disasters recorded. The Philippines alike lay third in the list of countries most affected by natural disasters in 2011 with 11. 7 million people affected. Previously, the country placed only 5th on that list.In terms of casualties, the Philippines is second to Japan with 1,924 people killed. In terms of frequence, flood topped the list with 121 reported incidents, or 28. 07% of the total number of disaster events monitored in 2011. This was followed by fire with 98 incidents bulk of which occurred in urban centers, particularly in congested urban myopic communities. Meanwhile, eart hquake occurred 78 times, while landslide 66 times, and tornado 23. equatorial Cyclones may not have made it to the top 5 most frequent disasters, but it affected the most number of people.At least 10. 3 Million people were affected in 2011. The two most poisonous tropical cyclones in 2011 are Tropical Storm Sendong (Washi) and Typhoon Pedring (Nesat). Prevention is doing forever and a day better than cure. Why wait for some predicted situations to happen when at first we are aware it will happen? Disasters and calamities though cannot be avoided but can be mitigated. These disasters may serve a lesson for us to croak a disaster resilient. Furthermore, what we really need to do is to develop a culture of safety in order to prepare ourselves against any disaster.It is not di? cult to demonstrate that we lack this culture, because examples can range from riding wheel bikes without helmets, to search and rescue teams not knowing where to ? nd rubber boats to save flood victims. Ac cording to Philippine Information Agency (PIA, 2011), during calamities, children are most vulnerable, reason to have education about disaster risk diminution. Since natural calamities are unpreventable, the best government can do is to reduce its portentous effect through knowledge on disaster preparedness.The provinces of Leyte, Southern Leyte and easterly Samar in Eastern Visayas are the provinces ad hocally at high risk of natural calamities like landslide and flooding as the said provinces are located in the eastern seaboard of the country. As a prophylactic measure against disaster the Department of study (DepEd), the Office of Civil refutal (OCD) and the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) have mandates to concretize disaster preparedness by integrating disaster reduction and management education in the curricula of the public secondary and tertiary schools.It was learned that some schools in Eastern Visayas have started adopting introductory courses and modules on di saster risk reduction at the start of classes this year. The Regional Risk Reduction Management Council (RDRRMC) tied up with the DepEd in the conduct of a training and seminar for teachers expected to direct the lawsuit. Some schools in Leyte have already included disaster risk reduction in their Earth Science subject even if the subject have yet to be formally ironed out between the National Disaster Risk Reduction Management Council (NDRRMC) and the DepEd (PIA, 2011).The subject will also be taught in the National Service Training Program (NSTP) for tertiary schools, technical-vocational, indigenous learning and in out of school youth courses. (PIA-8) It is very helpful for students to have information about weather conditions in the Philippines. Good news from students and also to Filipino, Department of Science and Technology launched a ready application based on its highly successful get off calledNOAHwhich stands for Nationwide Operational estimation ofHazards. From the report, NOAH aims to provide reliable and authoritative information about weather conditions in the country.It is designed to be a disaster preparedness system to reduce loss of lives, and damages to properties due to rain-triggered naturalhazards. none that its accessible via a mobile application, Filipinos will be able to access information relevant to on-line(prenominal) weather conditions proper(ip) on the palm of theirhands. Raymund Liboro, Department of Science and Technology project managing director forNOAH said, When it comes to getting and accessing information, there is nothing more ubiquitous than the mobile promise. A 2011 World Bank study showed that 80 percent of Filipino households have a mobile phone, making the application convenient andaccessible.Furthermore, theNOAHmobile application will initially be available only for mechanical man smartphones. However, its sharing options will allow users to share information across different socialmedia. Future enhanc ements include incorporating a flood forecasting system. This will really help us give advance warning to residents of flood-prone areas and if there is a need to evacuate, said Vic Malano, Deputy Administrator of the Philippine Atmospheric, geophysical and AstronomicalServices. RELATED STUDIES A. Foreign Kevin Kupietz conducted a research authorize safekeeping of Emergency Preparedness Knowledge at Halifax Community College.According to him, there are more than 3. 5 million students attending more than 4,000 colleges and universities in America. These students, on with faculty and supply members could be at risk of injury or death from natural or manmade incidents and disasters on and off campus. It is known that how closely prepared and the actions one takes during an emergency can have a significant impact on the events outcome. The problem is that the emergency preparedness knowledge of students, faculty, and staff of colleges, like Halifax Community College is unknown.It i s critical for emergency preparedness planning to understand the core knowledge of the group that intends to develop protection plans for. With this in assessment the purpose of this descriptive study was to examine the current emergency preparedness knowledge of Halifax Community College students, faculty, and staff members. This study used a quantifiable survey tool or a web based examen instrument to explore the following questions pertaining to campus students, faculty, and staff What is their current of understanding of campus emergency procedures?What is their current level of knowledge is in regards to basic emergency preparedness? What is their current level of emergency preparedness based on the prevention actions they have taken? Kupietz study found that overall knowledge towards preparedness and prevention was fair to good for those that participated. The study also indicated that while the knowledge may be possessed the prevention actions were not always put into plac e by participants. This study concluded that a college campus puts a spectacular quantity of people together in a small geographic area.This can create the risk of an event leading to multiple injuries and/or deaths. College campuses often represent a new world of freedom for spring chicken adults that may lead to reckless behaviors such as drinking in excess. These factors, singularly and combined, put the typical college campus at risk. Through prevention programs that are able to promote good information with high retention range that inspire people to take preventative actions the risk can be greatly reduced.Through further research providing foundational information for prevention specialists to work from great strides can be made to protect the students, faculty, and staff of not only Halifax Community College but of colleges across the country. B. Local There was an assessment of disaster preparedness in selected public schools in Luzon, Philippines. This study was conduct ed by Jonathan Guevarra, Caridad Ancheta, Jason Dela Pena, Adelwisa Ortega and Theresita Lariosa. This study will attempt to describe the disaster preparedness of selected public schools and also schoolhouses disaster preparedness plan.Furthermore, this study will also attempt to determine awareness of pick out school personnel on disaster preparedness programs (both local and national) and Department of Education (DepEd) disaster related policies. From their study, 37 key personnel from elementary and secondary schools were discourseed using an interview guide from January to March 2006. They maked the written permit from the Department of Education (DepEd) parting Superintendent. Prior to interview respondents, consent form was confineed. They were collected the school profile and data on each Schools disaster preparedness.Using descriptive statistics, data was analyzed. After a long period of time, they come up with the following results of the 37 schools covered in the s tudy, most (59%) of them came from the National big(p) Region (NCR) and most of them were Elementary Schools. Thirty five schools (95%) reported to have formed disaster committees. However, less than one third (30%) of the respondent schools had disaster preparedness plans. The majority (95%) of the public schools conducted drills once a year. The most common type of drill conducted in these schools was fire and earthquake drills.Fifty-one percent (51%) were not used as centers of evacuation during the disasters that occurred in the last five years. The majority (95%) of the public school key personnel were aware of the national local disaster management programs. All respondents were aware of disaster-related DepEd policies. The five researchers concluded that this study provided a glimpse of the efforts that teachers and students are preparing in times of emergencies and disasters. They recommend that specific hazards that affect schools may have to be addressed. Chemical spills , food toxic condition and infectious disease outbreaks are examples of these.These may also be considered the preparation of the Schools preparedness plans. As we reviewed the related literature from the local and foreign studies, it may help to understand the current study. From the local study- Assessment of Disaster Preparedness in Selected Public Schools in Luzon, Philippines, we knew already the status of elementary and secondary students of Luzon in preparing for disaster. In contrast, this current study focuses only to students of Pangasinan State University, Lingayen Campus in assessing also the level or status of their disaster preparedness.Furthermore, this current study does not attempt to determine awareness of key school personnel on disaster preparedness programs but it is interchangeable to the method to be used in analyzing data. From the foreign study entitled Disaster Preparedness Concepts, Guidance, and Research, it has also a great help to my study. They gave drumhead of concepts, guidance and research about disaster preparedness. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK From the insights of the related studies and literatures presented earlier, certain concepts stood out as the source of the conceptual framework of this study.Through this, the main intention of this study is to determine the level of disaster preparedness of PSU students in Lingayen Campus. The foreplay variables of the study are the profile of the respondents which consist of age, gender, course and section, and civil status. The process is analyzing the information through the descriptive method using questionnaire. The siding of this study is the level of disaster preparedness of PSU students in Lingayen Campus. The paradigm found on the succeeding page has guided the researcher in the conduct of this study. PARADIGM Analysis of the input through the descriptive survey methodAnalysis of the input through the descriptive survey method 1. Personal profile of the students in terms of a . Sex b. Age c. Civil status 2. The level of preparedness in terms of a. Natural Disasters b. Man-made Disasters 3. Problems Encountered by the respondents. 4. Personal Profile of the students in terms of d. Sex e. Age f. Civil status 5. The level of preparedness in terms of c. Natural Disasters d. Man-made Disasters 6. Problems Encountered by the respondents. Level of Disaster Preparedness of Pangasinan State University- Lingayen Campus S. Y 2012-2013Level of Disaster Preparedness of Pangasinan State University- Lingayen Campus S. Y 2012-2013 INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT Figure 1 range of a function of the study showing the relationship between the input- process and output of the study. Chapter 3 Research Methodology This chapter deals with the different approaches and techniques used by the researchers in pull together the important data to complete this study. It involves the research design, research locale, samples and sampling techniques, subject, research design, data gathering pr ocedure, validation of instrument, data processing method and statistical treatment. Research DesignThis study is basically descriptive research work. Descriptive research deals with the description, recording, analysis and interpretation of the phenomena that already exist (Calderon, 1993). The data were presented and discussed using descriptive and inferential analysis technique. Population and Sample of the Study There are 6,447 students enrolled in PSU Lingayen Campus. Ten percent (10%) of the total number of students will be chosen as respondents using stratified random sampling. The distribution is shown in Figure 2. YEAR LEVEL NUMBER OF ENROLLED STUDENTS 10% First year 1,793 179 Second year 1,642 164Third year 1,584 158 Fourth year 1,428 143 gibe 6,447 645 Figure 2. Distribution of the Respondents of the Study Research Locale The study on the Level of Disaster Preparedness of PSU students, Lingayen Campus was conducted at Pangasinan State University, Lingayen Campus S. Y 201 2-2013 Research Instrument The researchers employed questionnaires in gathering data from the respondents. Questionnaire is defined as the document containing a list of questions related to particular topic. The data which will be obtained from the returned questionnaires will be carefully studied to come up with an appropriate output.This study covers research questionnaires as data gathering instrument. The questionnaire is shared into three parts. The first research questionnaire was made to gather information about personal profile of the respondents such as age, sex, and others. The second questionnaire was intended to obtain data on the disaster preparedness of the respondents. The third questionnaire was intended also to determine the problems encountered by the respondents in disaster preparedness. Validation of the Instrument The instrument used in this study will be valid until School Year 2012-2013.Data Gathering Procedure The researcher was able to gather data thru ques tionnaire that was given to the respondents. This questionnaire during the time that the respondent answering the questionnaire, the researcher was able to have small informal interviews with the respondents and ask something related to the research problem. Data touch on Method Through descriptive method, data were analyzed. Statistical Tools and Treatment The data that were obtained using the questionnaires and the tests were subjected to statistical procedures as followsPart 1 on the profile of the respondents are measured and analyzed by percentages, and frequency. The formula is as follows P= fN x 100 Where P= percentage f= frequency N= number of respondents For problem No. 2, average burthen mean was used in determining the level of disaster preparedness in terms of hazard knowledge The formula in calculating the average weighted mean is shown below AWM= ? fxN Where= Average Weighted Mean ?= summation of f= frequency x= the number that corresponding to the level of preparedn ess N= total number of respondentsThe results will be interpreted using the Lickert ordered series which is described below Range Scale Descriptive Rating 5 4. 21- 5. 00 Very much prepared (VMP) 4 3. 41-4. 20 Much prepared (MP) 3 2. 61-3. 40 Moderately prepared (MP) 2 1. 81-2. 60 plum prepared (FP) 1 1. 0-1. 80 Not prepared (NP) For Problem No. 3, the problems encountered by the students on the disaster preparedness had been computed by using frequency count and ranking. BIBLIOGRAPHY Africa. Carla, Philippine Disasters 9 November 2012. http//www. academia. edu/693831/Lessons_from_recent_Philippine_disastersAschenbrener, M. (2001). In Twombly S. (Ed. ), How colleges and Universities respond to natural disaster. unify States- Kansas The University of Kansas. Retrieved from http//www. npr. org/templates/story/story. php? storyId=9603275 Campus Fire Watch (2011, April 11). Current fire information. Retrieved from http//www. campus-firewatch. com/resources%20center/currentinfo. hyper text markup language CDC (2007). 10 leading causes of death by age group, United States-2007. Retrieved from http//cdc. gov/injury/leadingcauses. hypertext markup language Clunn N. (2010. October, 22). Students need lessons in off-campus safety.NorthJersey. com. Retrieved from http//www. northjersey. com/news/crime_courts/105505788Students_need_lessons_in_off-campus_safety. html FEMA (2011). Emergency response action steps. Retrieved from http//www. fema. gov/plan/ehp/response. shtm Gaull, E. (1997, May). Show me the results Fire Chief. HCC (2010). Halifax Community Colleges annual report 2010. Retrieved from http//www. halifaxcc. edu/AnnualReport/annualreport2010. pdf Mowrer, F. W. (1999). Fire safe student housing a guide for campus housing administrators. Emmitsburg, MD United States Fire Administration. Park, M. 2009, September, 22). Students ad H1N1 mingle on campus. CNN. Retrieved from http//articles. cnn. com. /2009-09-22/health/h1n1. flu,college. students_1_h_1 _n_1-flu-pre vention-seasonal-flu? _s=PMHEALT http//upmcphresearchoffice. weebly. com http//www. futuregov. asia/articles/2012/nov/09/philippines-launches-mobile-app-disaster-preparedn/ http//www. universityworldnews. com/article. php? story=20120518132734905 http//www. academia. edu/1936994/An_Analysis_on_Environmental_Management_Polic y_in_the_Philippines APPENDICES accessory A QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE LEVEL OF DISASTER PREPAREDNESSI. RESPONDENTS PERSONAL PROFILE caution Please check your appropriate answers honestly. Your response will be of strict confidentiality. 1. Name ____________________________ (optional) 2. Gender( ) Male ( ) Female 3. Age( ) 16-18 years old( ) 22-24 years old ( ) 19-21 years old( ) 25 above 4. Civil Status( ) iodin( ) hook up with II. LEVEL OF DISASTER PREPAREDNESS Direction Please check on the column that describes the level of disaster preparedness. Numerical ValueDescriptive Equivalent 5very much prepared 4much prepared 3averagely prepared 2fairly prepared 1not pr epared . Natural Disasters 5 4 3 2 1 Climactic Variability (La Nina, El Nino) coastal Erosion Drought Earthquake Flood Landslide Tsunami Typhoon and Tropical Surges volcanic Eruption Wildfire Disease Epidemic 2. Man-made Disasters 5 4 3 2 1 Fire Incident Structural Collapse high-risk Spills Water Breakdown Food Scarcity Pollution Direction baffle a check on the answer you perceived most. 1. be you aware of the types of emergencies/ hazards that can potentially affect your area? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) perchance 2. Do you think that your family is relatively well-prepared for a disaster? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) maybe 3. Do you believe that the community you live in is relatively well- prepared for a disaster? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) peradventure 4. go through you discussed disaster preparedness with your family, friends, classmates and neighbors? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) perhaps 5. Do you know how to call for help? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 6. Are you aware with the contact number of different governing (police hotline)? ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 7. Have you conducted a hazard, impact, and vulnerability assessments? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 8. Do you have a Family Disaster Supply Kit? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 9. Are you current in First-Aid training (trained in the last 3 years)? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 10. Do you participate in any seminars related to Disaster Preparedness? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 11. Are you responsible in CPR (Cardio-Pulmonary? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 12. Do you know how to operate or use the fire extinguisher? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 13. Do you monitor TV and radio reports? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 4. Do you know where your family records are? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 15. Do you stay calm and remember what it is that you know and how it is way out to get you through the situation youre in? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 16. Are you aware where your family will meet outside your home in case of an emer gency? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 17. Have you practiced an emergency drill in your home or school within the past year? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 18. Do you know about disaster plans at your school? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 19. Are you aware with the precautionary measures in case of disasters? ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 20. Some family members have special needs, for example the elderly, mobility impaired or sick. Do you have a plan for making sure these members will be safe during a disaster? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 21. Do you have plan for your pets? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 22. Do you prepare a recovery plans? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 23. Do you secure your important documents and properties? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe 24. Do you have the mobile application end NOAH (Nationwide Operational Assessment ofHazards)? ( ) Yes( ) No( ) Maybe III.PROBLEM ENCOUNTERED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN THE DISASTER PREPAREDNESS Direction Please put a check on the seat provided for which is you think is the most problem th at you encounter in the disaster preparedness. _____ inadequacy of conducting hazard, impact, and vulnerability assessments _____Lack of appreciation and support to the Disaster Preparedness _____Lack of Disaster set up Council at the local level _____Erroneous disaster reporting and monitoring _____ hard to measure the effects _____ Lack of disaster information material _____ scant(p) training in disaster preparedness by key barangay people _____ Lack of facilities ____ Lack of evacuation plans _____ Lack of time to prepare platform VITAE RYAN SANCHEZ ORIS 235Barangay Lasip, Lingayen, Pangasinan 09077996587 emailprotected com I. Personal Background Age18 Date of BirthAugust 6, 1994 Place of BirthPangasinan GenderMale Civil StatusSingle NationalityFilipino Height Weight II. Educational Background TertiaryBachelor of Secondary Education (Physical Science) Pangasinan State University Alvear St. Brgy. Poblacion, Lingayen, Pangasinan 2011-present SecondaryLasip National High School Lasip. Lingayen, Pangasinan Salutatorian 2007-2011