Compare and Contrast two poems bringing out and explaining each poet’s attitude Essay

Compargon and Contrast two poems speech out and explaining each poets attitude to capital of the United Kingdom, and commenting on the differences and similarities in the way they write.In this following essay I will be comparing, contrasting and analysing two poems written in the 19th Century by two poets. The two poems that I will be analysing are called capital of the United Kingdom and Upon Westminster Bridge written by William Wordsworth and William Blake.William Wordsworth was an English poet painter, born on November 28th, 1757. Blake dog-tired the majority of his quiet life on the Southern Coast of England from 1800-1803. The exclusion of which was a short visit to Felpham. He died in 1827 at the develop of 70.Like Blake, Wordworth was an English Ro domaintic poet. He was born on April 7th, 1770 Wordsworth exhausted most of his life in the Lake District.In capital of the United Kingdom, Blake talks more(prenominal) or less his disgust for capital of the United Kingdom a nd how he feels a certain amount of benignity for its inhabitants.In the first stanza Blake says I wander thro each charterd street. This gives the implication that the city is a hug maze of streets and alleys. By exploitation the formulate wander to describe his journey, the implication this has is that it is as though he was walking aimlessly through the city. It makes the reader canvass London through the eyes of Blake. Using this with the pronoun I makes it so much more of a personal encounter, and as the reader sees it through his eyes it is for them too.The tack that all of this has on the reader is that they feel as though Blake design that t present was no-w here(predicate) in London that was worthwhile visiting, covering how negative his feelings were towards the city.The word charterd is repeated, this is done to remind the reader of the commercial personality of the city in the way that either occasion is owned. This is also emphasised on the succeeding(prenomin al) line of the stanza when Blake says, where the charterd Thames does flow. This is implying that even the river is owned. The river can be interpreted as a symbol-life. Following a path mark off out for us, but only he finds depression along his way, again, showing the reader that he has lost a certain amount of combine in the city.In the same stanza he says And mark in each face I meet, by this he means that he is able to see the depression in the city, caused by poverty, greed among early(a) things, all of which are effecting the rich and the poor. He repeats the word mark to strengthen the point that everywhere he is looking he can see symbolic marks. The use of the term mark also has other meaning, one of impurity, sins and scars, (which can be linked with comments later on in the poem). In this Blake may be using his technique of language to set up how, in his opinion, everybody in London is to blame for the condition, which it is was in.He comes from a put down middl e class background the son of a hosier and the tone of this poem expresses his awareness of the poverty around him marks of weakness, marks of woes.By using repetition in the first stanza, Blake makes the reader feel that as he walks thro each charterd street he is viewing images that gross out him.In the second stanza, Blake is reminding the reader how the depression is affecting every man. Again he uses the technique of repletion to emphasise the word every reinforcing the idea of collectiveness and blame for the whole city. This reminds the reader that nobody is able to fountain the conditions of the depression.In this stanza Blake talks about ever Infants countersign of fear. This is suggesting that the children are afraid of what they invite been born into, and fearing that there is no hope whatsoever for the future. Blake goes on to talk about this when he says that they have an almost certain chance of becoming chimney sweeps or prostitutes, sooner the age of twelve. By describing it like this Blake succeeds in shocking and depressing the reader. It is here too that he plays on the concept of childhood innocence. By mentioning the children here he evokes the concept of innocence but it is ironic that this poem contains no innocence of its own, at all. This suggests to the reader how truly desperate the children are,Blake suggests and blames the citizens of London for the state that it is in. He describes, mind forgd manacles. This means that the only thing that is preventing the people from living happy lives is their negative and depressive ways of thinking.In the terce stanza, Blake makes reference to the Chimney-sweepers cry. At the time he wrote this poem, newborn children, especially young boys, were sent up chimneys to clean them. Many got trap and died there. By reminding the reader of these conditions he makes the reader realise how horrific these events were. In this he tries to emphasise what a terrible place London was.Blake think the sweepers to the church when he says Every blackning Church apalls. He is tell that the church is tainting themselves by not defending the chimney-sweepers. By involving the church in this whole affair Blake brings to sight how deep this chain of corruption went with regards to authority. The trades union of the words church and apalls also has a similar effect, as they are two contrasting words. Blake simply means that the church is no serious filling its role to comfort the needy and is instead turning a blind eye on the suffering. Blake believes that the church was part of the reason London was in such a state.